Editorial and corrections policy
Everything published on this site is written to be checkable. This page says how, and what happens when we get something wrong.
Who writes it
Everything on the blog is written by Barry Jeremy Love, who builds GrowthFuse at Mind Fuse Inc.. Articles carry a byline and a publication date. There are no ghostwritten posts and no guest bylines.
How claims are sourced
Every factual claim falls into one of three buckets, and each is labelled as such in the reference list at the foot of the article:
- Primary— a vendor’s own page, a platform’s own policy, or another first-hand document. Every primary URL we cite was opened before publication.
- Community report — a forum post or public account by someone describing their own experience. Useful as evidence that something happens; not evidence of how often.
- Own research — work we did ourselves, always with the date it was done. Our competitive scan of this category was run on 5 June 2026 across roughly seventy sources, and every price quoted from it is stamped with that date.
We do not cite a number we have not seen at its source. Where a figure exists in our marketing copy but was never verified, the blog omits it rather than repeating it — that is why the article on tool costs prices only the layer we could actually source.
Prices and competitor claims
Prices change, and comparison tables rot faster than anything else on a site like this. Any competitor pricing or capability we publish is a snapshot of what that vendor listed publicly on the date given, nothing more. We do not claim a competitor lacks a feature — we say whether it was listed. If you work at one of the companies named and something is out of date or wrong, write to us and we will fix it.
The corrections process
- Email [email protected] with the page and what is wrong. Anyone can do this; you do not need to be a customer.
- We check it against the source. If we were wrong, the page is corrected within five working days.
- Substantive corrections are disclosed on the page itself — a dated note at the foot of the article saying what changed and when. We do not quietly edit a claim and leave the original date standing.
- Typos, broken links and formatting are fixed silently. Only changes that alter meaning get a note.
When an article is revised on a date later than its publication date, both dates appear in the page’s structured data, so an automated reader sees the revision too.
What we will not publish
- Customer results we cannot evidence. If a metric appears, it happened and we can show it.
- Statistics without a source, including plausible-sounding industry figures.
- Reviews or testimonials that were not written by the person named.
- Content generated wholesale by a model and published without a human checking every claim in it.
Corrections log
No corrections have been issued yet. This section will list them, most recent first, with the date and what changed.